Hearing on Bihar SIR postponed, Supreme Court said- if necessary, you can interfere even after the publication of the final list

The Supreme Court has given the ongoing voter list in Bihar ie Sir The hearing has been postponed till 7 October. The Election Commission requested the court to publish the final voter list on 1 October. Only then the matter should be heard. The petitioner side Sir Expressed the debate on many issues including validity of.

Petitioner NGO Association for Democratic Reforms (Adr) On behalf of the lawyer Prashant Bhushan requested the hearing before the publication of the final voter list, but the bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joyamalya Bagchi said that the publication of the list would not affect. If they get any illegality in the process, then they will intervene even after the list is published.

Prashant Bhushan alleged that Election Commission Sir Not following its own rules in the process. Despite the court order, the Commission is not uploading objections filed with them. This argument was strongly opposed by senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for the Election Commission. He said that all information is being given to voters.

Keep in mind that in the hearing held on September 8, the court also gave Aadhaar Sir I was asked to accept as a valid document. However, the court had made it clear that Election Commission officials can also ask for other documents to confirm the validity of the Aadhaar card. In the hearing held on Monday, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi said that the court to be held in all states Sir For the Aadhaar should also be ordered to be considered as documents.

The court currently refused to give any order for other states. Lawyer Ashwini Upadhyay gave Aadhaar Sir I opposed the status of valid documents. He said that 11 documents fixed by the Election Commission make government departments. Aadhaar card is made in Jan Suvidha Kendra. It also becomes available to foreigners. Therefore, the court should exclude it from the list of valid documents. The court issued a notice on Upadhyay’s petition and said that all things will be heard in the next hearing.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *