Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi Fails to appear before lucknow mp MLA court in Indian Army Defamation Case Ann

Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi: On Monday (June 23), Congress leader Rahul Gandhi did not appear before the ACJM III MP-MLA court in Lucknow on the date of fifth hearing in the Indian Army’s insult case. In the case of Uday Shankar Srivastava vs Rahul Gandhi case, the Congress leader had filed an application under the application number 4623/2025 to dismiss the case against him and to dismiss the summons order issued on February 11, 2015 before the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court.

Lucknow Bench of High Court rejected Rahul Gandhi’s application

In this case, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court found all the proceedings taken by the ACJM III (Trial Court) and the summons order issued on 11 February 2015 was found to be legally correct and the application filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi dismissed in a detailed order of June 29, 2025.

After this, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi did not appear in the ACJM III MP-MLA court on the fifth date of June 4, the fourth date of 2025 and Monday (June 23). Uday Shankar Srivastava vs. Rahul Gandhi, accused in the case of accused Congress leader and Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition, Pranshu Aggarwal, took the basis of filing the SLP in the Supreme Court and argued by applying.

The complainant appealed to issue non-bailable warrants against Rahul Gandhi

Complainant Uday Shankar Srivastava also filed an application in the case that Rahul Gandhi has no stay order in today’s date and the judicial situation is that just by filing an appeal in the Higher Court, the trial court does not stop.

The complainant’s lawyer Vivek Tiwari and complainant Uday Shankar Srivastava made a strong debate against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to issue non -bailable warrants.

Court reserved its decision after hearing

After listening to both sides, ACJM III MP-MLA Court has secured its decision. On going to the decision, it will be interesting to see whether Rahul Gandhi gets relief or a warrant is issued against him.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *